ABSTRACT
Submission content Introduction: An unusual case of a very young patient without previously known cardiac disease presenting with severe left ventricular failure, detected by a point of care echocardiogram. Main Body: A 34 year old previously well man was brought to hospital after seeing his general practitioner with one month of progressive shortness of breath on exertion. This began around the time the patient received his second covid-19 vaccination. He was sleeping in a chair as he was unable to lie flat. Abnormal observations led the GP to call an ambulance. In the emergency department, the patient required oxygen 5L/min to maintain SpO2 >94%, but he was not in respiratory distress at rest. Blood pressure was 92/53mmHg, mean 67mmHg. Point of care testing for COVID-19 was negative. He was alert, with warm peripheries. Lactate was 1.0mmol/L and he was producing more than 0.5ml/kg/hr of urine. There was no ankle swelling. ECG showed sinus tachycardia. He underwent CT pulmonary angiography which demonstrated no pulmonary embolus, but there was bilateral pulmonary edema. Troponin was 17ng/l, BNP was 2700pg/ml. Furosemide 40mg was given intravenously by the general medical team. Critical care outreach asked for an urgent intensivist review given the highly unusual diagnosis of pulmonary edema in a man of this age. An immediate FUSIC Heart scan identified a dilated left ventricle with end diastolic diameter 7cm and severe global systolic impairment. The right ventricle was not severely impaired, with TAPSE 18mm. There was no significant pericardial effusion. Multiple B lines and trace pulmonary effusions were identified at the lung bases. The patient was urgently discussed with the regional cardiac unit in case of further deterioration, basic images were shared via a cloud system. A potential diagnosis of vaccination-associated myocarditis was considered,1 but in view of the low troponin, the presentation was felt most likely to represent decompensated chronic dilated cardiomyopathy. The patient disclosed a family history of early cardiac death in males. Aggressive diuresis was commenced. The patient was admitted to a monitored bed given the potential risk of arrhythmia or further haemodynamic deterioration. Advice was given that in the event of worsening hypotension, fluids should not be administered but the cardiac centre should be contacted immediately. Formal echocardiography confirmed the POCUS findings, with ejection fraction <35%. He was initiated on ACE inhibitors and beta adrenergic blockade. His symptoms improved and he was able to return home and to work, and is currently undergoing further investigations to establish the etiology of his condition. Conclusion(s): Early echocardiography provided early evidence of a cardiac cause for the patient's presentation and highlighted the severity of the underlying pathology. This directed early aggressive diuresis and safety-netting by virtue of discussion with a tertiary cardiac centre whilst it was established whether this was an acute or decompensated chronic pathology. Ultrasound findings: PLAX, PSAX and A4Ch views demonstrating a severely dilated (7cm end diastolic diameter) left ventricle with global severe systolic impairment.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Data about COVID-19 patients treated with veno-arterial-ECMO (VA-ECMO) is limited. Reported survival rates range from 27.9% to 77.8%, depending on VA-ECMO indication. A subgroup of patients suffers from circulatory failure due to a COVID-19 associated hyperinflammatory state (CovHI). In these patients, differentiation between inflammation and sepsis is difficult but important. In this retrospective case series, differential diagnoses of COVID-19 associated refractory circulatory failure and survival rates in different indications for VA-ECMO are investigated. Method(s): Retrospective analysis of 28 consecutive COVID-19 patients requiring VA-ECMO at the University Hospital Regensburg between March 2020 and May 2022. Specific treatment for COVID-19 was in accordance with respective guidelines. Mycotic infections were either invasive or met current definitions of COVID19-associated-pulmonary aspergillosis. Result(s): At VA-ECMO initiation, median age was 57.3 years (IQR: 51.4 - 61.8), SOFA score 16 (IQR: 13 - 17) and norepinephrine dosing 0.53mug/kg/min (IQR: 0.32 - 0.78). Virus-variants were: 61% wild-type, 14% Alpha, 18% Delta and 7% Omicron. Survival to hospital discharge was 39%. 17 patients were primarily supported with VA-ECMO only (survival 42%), 3 patients were switched from VV to VA-ECMO (survival 0%), and 8 patients were converted from VA to VAV or VV-ECMO (survival 50%). Indications for VA-ECMO support were pulmonary embolism (PE) (n=5, survival 80%), right heart failure due to secondary pulmonary hypertension (n=5, survival 20%), cardiac arrest (n=4, survival 25%), acute left heart failure (ALHF) (n=11, survival 36%) and refractory vasoplegia (n=3, survival 0%). Inflammatory markers at VA-ECMO initiation were higher in patients with ALHF or vasoplegia;in these patients a higher rate of invasive fungal infections (10/14, 71% vs. 4/14, 29%;p=0.023) compared to the other patients was found. Conclusion(s): Survival on VA-ECMO in COVID-19 depends on VA-ECMO indication, which should be considered in further studies and clinical decisions making. Circulatory failure due to vasoplegia should be considered very carefully as indication for VA-ECMO. A high rate of mycotic infections mandates an intense microbiological workup of these patients and must be considered as an important differential diagnosis to CovHI.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Treatment of severe respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) had a mortality of up to 70% in Germany. Many patients with COVID-19 need VV-ECMO support longer than 28 days (long-term VV-ECMO). Evidence on mortality, complications during intensive care, functional status after discharge and mortality-predictors for patients supported with long-term VV-ECMO is lacking. Method(s): Retrospective study of 137 consecutive patients treated with VV-ECMO for ARDS due to COVID-19 at University Hospital Regensburg from March 2020 to March 2022. Result(s): 38% (n=52;87% male) of patients needed longterm VV-ECMO support. In these, SOFA score (median [IQR]) at ECMO initiation was 9 [8-11], age 58.2 [50.6- 62.5] years, PaO2/FiO2-ratio 67 [52-88] mmHg, pCO262 [52-74] mmHg, Murray-Score 3.3 [3.0-3.6] and PEEP 15 [13 - 16] cmH2O. Duration of long-term support was 45 [35-65] days. 26 (50%) patients were discharged from the ICU. Only one patient died after hospital discharge. At VVECMO initiation, baseline characteristics did not differ between deceased and survivors. Complications were frequent (acute kidney injury: 31/52, renal replacement therapy: 14/52, pulmonary embolism: 21/52, intracranial hemorrhage 8/52, major bleeding 34/52 and secondary sclerosing cholangitis: 5/52) and more frequent in the deceased. Karnofsky index (normal 100) after rehabilitation was 70 [57.5-82.5]. Twelve of the 18 patients discharged from rehabilitation had a satisfactory quality of life according to their own subjective assessment. Four patients required nursing support. Mortality-predictors within the first 30 days on VV-ECMO only observed in those who deceased later, were: Bilirubin >5mg/dl for > 7 days, pulmonary compliance <10ml/mbar for >14 days, and repeated serum concentrations of interleukin 8 >150ng/L. Conclusion(s): Long-term extracorporeal lung support in patients with COVID-19 resulted in 50 % survival and subsequently lead to a satisfactory quality of life and functionality in the majority of patients. It should preferably be performed in experienced centers because of a high incidence of complications. Several findings during the early course were associated with late mortality but need validation in large prospective studies.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Long-COVID, the persistence of various symptoms after COVID-19 infection, is still not fully understood. This study evaluated the incidence and chronicity of post-COVID-19 conditions using administrative claims, which provide a large, generalizable sample, to provide insight into the scope of long-COVID in the United States. Method(s): Patients newly diagnosed with COVID-19 from 4/1/2020-3/31/2021 were identified in the MerativeTM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases. The first COVID-19 diagnosis served as the index date and patients were continuously eligible for 12-months pre- and post-index. Incident conditions were defined as a new diagnosis (no pre-period diagnoses) for one of 17 conditions of interest in the first 60-days of the post-period. Among patients with an incident condition, chronicity of the condition was assessed over the remaining post-period (long-term conditions). Result(s): The sample included 503,742 patients;mean+/-SD age was 39.5+/-16.5 and 46% were male. The most common incident conditions were respiratory symptoms (24.1%), fatigue (7.3%), muscle pain (6.0%), and headache (5.9%). Among patients with each of these conditions, long-term persistence was observed in 21.9% for respiratory symptoms, 36.8% for muscle pain, 18.3% for fatigue, and 16.0% for headache. Fewer than 5% patients evidenced incident anxiety, mood disorders, myocarditis, sleep disorders, or pulmonary embolism;however, among these patients, over 40% had long-term persistence of the condition. Among patients with long-term conditions, sleep disorders (248+/-98 days), mood disorders (239+/-96 days), anxiety (236+/-95 days), respiratory symptoms (233+/-92 days), and asthma (230+/-93 days) had the longest average durations of persistence, evidenced by continued claims over the post-period. Conclusion(s): With the continued presence of COVID-19 an understanding of the risk of long-term symptoms is needed to help manage patients both during and following infection. These findings provide some initial insight into the incidence and tenure of various conditions that are affecting patients diagnosed with COVID-19.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
The current COVID-19 climate has caused an unforeseen supply shortage of iodinated contrast media (ICM) worldwide, disrupting global distribution.1 In addition, the scarcity has resulted in a ripple effect in healthcare facilities such as radiology departments where ICM is required to perform contrast-enhanced examinations. ICM plays a significant part in contrast-enhanced CT, angiography and fluoroscopic procedures within the radiology department, holding a primary role in the differentiation and diagnosis of pathologies which range from pulmonary emboli to tumours.1 Its use extends beyond radiology, where ICM is heavily relied on in cardiology, urology and gastrointestinal studies, further highlighting the heavy dependence on the critical agent.2 With the global increase in the number of CT examinations requested, where approximately 60% of studies require ICM, optimal usage of ICM must be considered to meet heightened demand.3 The shortage has represented an opportunity for imaging providers to re-examine current imaging protocols and identify whether non-contrast imaging, alternative contrast agents and other imaging modalities could be viable options moving forward.1,2 Additionally, current literature has discussed volume-reduction strategies and dual-energy use in newer-generation CT scanners to conserve ICM.1,4 This review will explore currently proposed solutions that can be implemented in the radiology department to maximise ICM supply with minimal impact on patient care.
ABSTRACT
We conducted a review and evaluated the already documents reports for the relationship among diabetes and COVID-19. The review outcome shows that the COVID-19 severity seems to be greater among patients with diabetes as comorbidity. So, strict glycemic control is imperative in patients infected with COVID-19. Thus, world-wide diabetes burden and COVID-19 pandemic must be deliberated as diabetes increases the COVID-19 severity. Established on this, it is precise significant to follow specific treatment protocols and clinical management in COVID-19 patients affected with diabetes to prevent morbidity and mortality.Copyright © 2023 The Authors.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The objective of this study is to assess the clinical benefits and potential risks of using venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) as a treatment for COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Method(s): Relevant studies were identified through searches of electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, from January 2020 to December 2022. We included observational studies on adult patients who received venovenous (VV) ECMO support for COVID-19-induced ARDS. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, 3-month mortality, and complications associated with VV ECMO. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.0.3 and the metafor and meta packages. Result(s): The final analysis included 39 studies comprising 10,702 patients. In-hospital mortality for adults receiving ECMO was 34.2% (95% CI: 28.5% - 40.3%;I2 = 93%), while the 3-month mortality rate was 50.2% (95% CI: 44.4% - 56.0%;I2 = 51%). Bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in 33.7% of patients (95% CI, 23.9 - 45.1;I2 = 96%). The pooled estimates for other complications were as follows: overall thromboembolic events 40.9% (95% CI, 24.8 - 59.3;I2 = 97%), stroke 8.7% (95% CI, 5.7 - 13.2;I2 = 72%), deep vein thrombosis 15.4% (95% CI, 9.7 - 23.6;I2 = 80%), pulmonary embolism 15.6% (95% CI, 9.3 - 25.1;I2 = 92%), gastrointestinal haemorrhage 8.1% (95% CI, 5.5 - 11.8;I2 = 56%), and the need for any renal replacement therapy in 38.0% of patients (95% CI, 31.6 - 44.8;I2 = 84%). Bacterial pneumonia occurred in 46.4% of patients (95% CI, 32.5 - 61.0;I2 = 96%). Conclusion(s): Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) may be an effective treatment option for COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. The use of VV ECMO was associated with reduced in-hospital and 3-month mortality. However, bleeding is a common complication that should be closely monitored. Further research is needed to determine the optimal use of VV ECMO in this patient population and to identify factors that may predict a favourable response to treatment.
ABSTRACT
The problem of prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IMRD) remains highly relevant. The presence of IRD is associated with a high risk of disease and severe course of COVID-19 during immunosuppressive treatment, primarily anti-B cell therapy with rituximab (RTX), and a low level of post-vaccination response in such patients. A new strategy for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 are virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to coronavirus;currently, combined long-acting monoclonal antibodies tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld) are registered for prevention in the world and the Russian Federation. . Tixagevimab and cilgavimab (TC) show neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2, including the Omicron strain, primarily its variants BA.4, BA.5, BA.2.75 ("Centaur"). Objective - to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TC for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 in rheumatic patients receiving RTX, based on a prospective observational study. Materials and methods. The main group included 86 patients with various IMRD receiving RTX: 50 of them had ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis (AAV), 15 - rheumatoid arthritis, 9 - Sjogren's syndrome (SS), 4 - IgG4-related disease, 3 - systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 3 - dermatomyositis (DM), 2 - systemic scleroderma (SSD). Median age was 59 (19-82) years;male: female ratio - 1:1,8. From March 26 to August 30 2022, patients received a single intramuscular injection of TC in a total dose of 300 mg, mainly after RTX (in 52% of cases, in 28% on the next day after RTX). The control group included 42 patients with AAV (median age - 45 (35-71) years;male: female ratio - 1:1), also treated with RTX, who did not receive pre-exposure prophylaxis of TC. The duration of observation was 7 months, until November 1 2022. At this time, 98% of confirmed cases of coronavirus in the Russian Federation were Omicron. A telephone and/or online survey of patient has been conducted to detect cases of COVID-19 and adverse reactions. Results. In the TC group, confirmed coronavirus infection have been detected in 17 (20%) patients (AAV - 10, SS - 3, SSD - 2, SLE - 1, DM - 1), with fever in 7 (8%), only in one case hospitalization was required (lung damage was not detected in computed tomography), in two cases, according to CT mild lung damage (CT 1-2), there were no deaths. Good TC's tolerability was noted, signs not associated with COVID-19 or progression of IMRD after administration of TC were observed in 8 (9%) patients (GPA - 3 MPA - 1, RA - 2, SLE - 1, IgG4-related disease - 1), adverse reactions definitely associated with the use of TC were not found. The most serious event not associated with coronavirus infection was the progression of polyneuropathy in a patient with RA. In the control group, 3 (7%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, one with severe lung injury (CT 3, pulmonary embolism) and death. Conclusions. The data of clinical studies and our own clinical experience evidence the effectiveness of the use of a combination of long-acting monoclonal antibodies TC (Evusheld), registered for indications for pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. Patients with IMRD treated with RTX have a favorable safety profile of TC. The introduction of virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, a new drug class for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases, opens significant prospects for improving the prognosis of patients with IRD.Copyright © 2023 Ima-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The proceedings contain 117 papers. The topics discussed include: informing local policy through an audit of the assessment, management and outcomes of intermediate and high-risk patients with pulmonary embolism;an initial exploration into the use of a novel virtual reality system to aid rehabilitation in intensive care;surprising chest radiograph- air in mediastinum;exploring tissue donation as part of end-of-life wishes- a duty of care following death on ICU?;the impact of deprivation on respiratory support unit outcomes in COVID-19 patients, and highlights from wave 2 data in Portsmouth;survey of attitudes towards end of life care as a tool in identifying areas for improvement;a quality improvement project regarding family communication within critical care;sleep promotion in a busy inner city high dependency unit;findings from a regional survey of critical care nursing staff focusing on retention and factors that influence wellbeing;and tracking functional recovery post critical illness.
ABSTRACT
Background: As of December 2022, SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus resulted in over 6 million deaths worldwide.[1] It was realized early into the pandemic, that COVID-19 significantly impacts the Cardiovascular system. [2] Patients with pre-existing cardiovascular comorbidities were particularly at higher risk of adverse outcomes during their hospitalizations. [3] Similarly, it can be safe to assume patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) should considered a high-risk population for the development of severe COVID infection with increased rates of significant cardiovascular complications. Objective(s): Based on this reasoning and the paucity of data available on this topic using a large database, we sought to investigate the outcomes of patients with ACHD who were admitted to the hospital with COVID-19. Method(s): The National Inpatient Sample database for 2020 was queried to identify adult hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 and a secondary diagnosis of ACHD using International Classification of Diseases - 10 Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. The primary outcome studied was inpatient mortality, while secondary outcomes included inpatient complications, mean length of stay (LOS), and total hospital charge (THC). Multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were used to adjust for possible confounders and analyze the variables. Result(s): Out of 1,050,045 COVID-19 hospitalizations registered, 2,425 (0.23%) had ACHD as a secondary diagnosis. Encounters with ACHD who were hospitalized with COVID-19 had significantly higher adjusted odds of inpatient mortality (Adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR]: 1.4, [95% CI: 1.05-1.88], p=0.022), Longer LOS (Mean 2.4 days, [95% CI: 1.35-3.40], p <0.001), and higher Total Hospital Charges (Mean $53,000, [95% CI: 20811-85190], p <0.001). A Forrest plot (Figure 1) demonstrates a graphical representation of the multivariate analysis of the significant in-hospital complications when adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. Conclusion(s): Among COVID-19 hospitalizations, those with a history of congenital heart diseases had significantly worse outcomes in terms of in-hospital mortality, sepsis;the need for endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressors;developing acute kidney injury and pulmonary embolism, in addition to the longer length of stay, and higher total hospital charges. [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Tofacitinib and baricitinib were the first orally available, targeted synthetic Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the UK. Evidence suggests that JAK inhibitors are as efficacious as biological DMARDs in the treatment of RA. Their safety profile has been demonstrated in long term extension studies and RCTs. However, real-world, long-term data remains as important in bridging the gap between controlled studies and routine practice. We report our initial real-world experience of a cohort of RA patients commenced on JAKi before the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic within a regional centre in the UK. Methods All patients commenced on JAKi for the treatment of RA between February 2018 and March 2020 were identified from our in-house database. Data was retrospectively collected from clinical notes and electronic health records from February 2018 up until April 2022. This included patient demographics, disease duration, serological status, concurrent csDMARD usage, history of bDMARD exposure, duration of use and reason for discontinuation of the drug if appropriate. DAS- 28 scores were recorded at baseline and quarterly. SPSS (version 22.0) was used for data analysis. Results One hundred thirty patients were treated with JAK inhibitors (Tofacitinib 22%, Baricitinib 78%);80% female, mean (S.D.) age 61.5 (12.3) years. 92 (70.8%) patients were seropositive. 70 (53.8%) patients were on concurrent csDMARDs and 23 (17.7%) on concurrent steroids. The mean number of previous bDMARDs was 1.8 +/- 1.7;41 (31.5%) were bDMARD naive. The mean baseline DAS-28 ESR (S.D.) score was 5.96 (0.96). There were significant differences in mean DAS- 28 ESR scores (compared with baseline) of 1.54, 1.96, 2.41, 2.33 and 1.80 at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months respectively (p<0.0001). Mean DAS-28 ESR scores were not statistically significant between bDMARD naive patients and those that had previously received bDMARDs. Overall JAKi retention rate was 66.9% with a mean follow up duration of 27.4+/-13.1 months. Persistence was 88.5%, 76.9%, 73.2% and 68.5% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Of the 38 patients who stopped JAK inhibitors, 11 stopped due to inefficacy (6, primary inefficacy). 3 patients were lost to follow-up and 6 deceased. Cause of death was sepsis (2), venous thromboembolism (1) and unknown (3). 18 patients stopped because of adverse events (AEs). The most common AEs were recurrent infections (11), gastrointestinal side effects (9), lymphopenia (7), thromboembolic events (6) and herpes zoster (5). In total 6 (4.1%) patients had thromboembolic events which included pulmonary embolism (4) and deep vein thrombosis (1) and central retinal artery thrombosis (1). Conclusion JAK inhibitors in this real-world population of RA patients were effective in reducing disease activity and patients had high persistence rates. Recurrent infections, herpes zoster and thrombo-embolism remain adverse events of concern.
ABSTRACT
As the COVID-19 pandemic began, various non-specific symptoms were detected among recovered patients, such as general weakness, fatigue and insomnia. Later different studies described an increase in the incidence of cardiovascular complications (myocardial infarction, stroke, arrhythmia, myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, heart failure, hypertensive crisis) after a COVID-19 infection, while the exact mechanisms remain unclear. This article depicts the most significant data currently available on the incidence of cardiovascular complications after a COVID-19 infection and also describes some of the possible pathogenetic mechanisms.Copyright © 2022 Authors. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
AIM: to estimate the features of pseudomembranous colitis in patients with COVID-19, diagnostics, conservative treatment and surgery for complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: a retrospective analysis of 396 patients with pseudomembranous colitis (PMC) in patients with new coronavirus infection was carried out for the period from March 2020 to November 2021. Among them there were 156 (39.3%) males, females - 240 (60.6%), moderate and severe forms of COVID-19 occurred in 97.48%. The diagnosis of PMC was established due to clinical picture, laboratory, instrumental methods (feces on Cl. difficile, colonoscopy, CT, US, laparoscopy). RESULT(S): the PMC rate in COVID-19 was 1.17%. All patients received antibiotics, 2 or 3 antibiotics - 44.6%, glu-cocorticoids were received by all patients. At 82.8%, PMC developed during the peak of COVID-19. To clarify the PMC, CT was performed in 33.8% of patients, colonoscopy - 33.08%, laparoscopy - in 37.1% (to exclude bowel perforation, peritonitis). Conservative treatment was effective in 88.8%, 76 (19.1%) patients had indications for surgery (perforation, peritonitis, toxic megacolon). Most often, with peritonitis without clear intraoperative confir-mation of perforation, laparoscopic lavage of the abdominal cavity was performed (60 patients - 78.9%, mortality - 15.0%), colon resection (n = 6 (7.9%), mortality - 66.6%), ileo-or colostomy (n = 8 (10.5%), mortality - 37.5%), colectomy (n = 2 (2.6%), mortality - 50.0%). The overall postoperative mortality rate was 22.4%, the incidence of surgical complications was 43.4%. In addition, in the postoperative period, pneumonia was in 76.3%, thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in 22.3% of patients. In general, the overall mortality in our patients with PMC was 11.4%, with conservative treatment - 8.8%. CONCLUSION(S): pseudomembranous colitis is a severe, life-threatening complication of COVID-19. In the overwhelm-ing majority of patients, conservative therapy was effective, but almost 1/5 of patients developed indications for surgery, the latter being accompanied by high mortality and a high morbidity rate. Progress in the treatment of PMC, apparently, is associated with early diagnosis, intensive conservative therapy, and in the case of indications for surgery, their implementation before decompensation of the patient's condition and the development of severe intra-abdominal complications and sepsis.Copyright © 2022, Association of Coloproctologists of Russia. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Intro: The US CDC recommends that COVID-19 vaccines may be coadministered with other age-appropriate vaccines. There is limited data assessing outcomes, including reactogenicity, on such co-administration. For the first time, we present interim safety data of RZV administered concomitantly or sequentially with an mRNA-1273 booster vaccine. Method(s): In this phase 3, randomized, open-label, multi-center study (NCT05047770), adults aged >=50 years were randomized 1:1 to receive the first RZV dose with mRNA-1273 booster (50 mug) at day 1 and the second RZV dose at week (W)8 (Co-Administration group [Co-Ad]), or mRNA-1273 at day 1, the first RZV dose at W2 and the second RZV dose at W10 (Sequential group [Seq]). Descriptive analyses of solicited/unsolicited adverse events (AEs) with onset within 7/30 days post-mRNA-1273 or first RZV dose, and of serious AEs/potential immune-mediated diseases/AEs of special interest (SAEs/pIMDs/AESIs) reported until database freeze are reviewed. Finding(s): The exposed set comprised 267 (Co-Ad) and 272 (Seq) participants. In each group, most solicited AEs were mild/moderate in intensity and each with <=2.5 days median duration, the most frequent were injection site pain, myalgia, and fatigue. Unsolicited (vaccines-related) AEs were reported by 25.0% (2.9%) of participants post-mRNA-1273 in Seq, 25.2% (0.8%) post-RZV in Seq, and 37.1% (3.7%) in Co-Ad. SAEs/pIMDs/AESIs were reported for 6/1/2 participants in Co-Ad and 5/1/3 in Seq. In Seq, one SAE/AESI (pulmonary embolism) and one pIMD/AESI (cutaneous vasculitis) occurred 2 and 9 days postmRNA-1273 (before RZV administration), respectively, and were considered mRNA-1273-related by investigators. In Co-Ad, one AESI (chronic hepatitis) occurred 35 days post-second RZV dose, considered vaccines-related by Sponsor. No fatalities occurred. Conclusion(s): No safety concerns were identified. The frequency/severity/type of AEs were comparable between groups and consistent with the known safety profile of each vaccine, whether RZV and mRNA-1273 booster were administered concomitantly or sequentially. Co-administration may enhance vaccine coverage rates. Funding(s): GSKCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
AIM: to estimate the features of pseudomembranous colitis in patients with COVID-19, diagnostics, conservative treatment and surgery for complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: a retrospective analysis of 396 patients with pseudomembranous colitis (PMC) in patients with new coronavirus infection was carried out for the period from March 2020 to November 2021. Among them there were 156 (39.3%) males, females - 240 (60.6%), moderate and severe forms of COVID-19 occurred in 97.48%. The diagnosis of PMC was established due to clinical picture, laboratory, instrumental methods (feces on Cl. difficile, colonoscopy, CT, US, laparoscopy). RESULT(S): the PMC rate in COVID-19 was 1.17%. All patients received antibiotics, 2 or 3 antibiotics - 44.6%, glu-cocorticoids were received by all patients. At 82.8%, PMC developed during the peak of COVID-19. To clarify the PMC, CT was performed in 33.8% of patients, colonoscopy - 33.08%, laparoscopy - in 37.1% (to exclude bowel perforation, peritonitis). Conservative treatment was effective in 88.8%, 76 (19.1%) patients had indications for surgery (perforation, peritonitis, toxic megacolon). Most often, with peritonitis without clear intraoperative confir-mation of perforation, laparoscopic lavage of the abdominal cavity was performed (60 patients - 78.9%, mortality - 15.0%), colon resection (n = 6 (7.9%), mortality - 66.6%), ileo-or colostomy (n = 8 (10.5%), mortality - 37.5%), colectomy (n = 2 (2.6%), mortality - 50.0%). The overall postoperative mortality rate was 22.4%, the incidence of surgical complications was 43.4%. In addition, in the postoperative period, pneumonia was in 76.3%, thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in 22.3% of patients. In general, the overall mortality in our patients with PMC was 11.4%, with conservative treatment - 8.8%. CONCLUSION(S): pseudomembranous colitis is a severe, life-threatening complication of COVID-19. In the overwhelm-ing majority of patients, conservative therapy was effective, but almost 1/5 of patients developed indications for surgery, the latter being accompanied by high mortality and a high morbidity rate. Progress in the treatment of PMC, apparently, is associated with early diagnosis, intensive conservative therapy, and in the case of indications for surgery, their implementation before decompensation of the patient's condition and the development of severe intra-abdominal complications and sepsis.Copyright © 2022, Association of Coloproctologists of Russia. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objective: One of the potentially fatal consequences for diabetic patients is diabetic ketoacidosis acidosis (DKA), which is also linked to poor hospital outcomes. There is no much information in literature about COVID-19 and how it relates to other hospitalizations. The impact of COVID-19 on in-hospital mortality and other clinically relevant outcomes for DKA patients is being investigated for the first time in this study. Method(s): Patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of DKA with or without a subsequent diagnosis of COVID-19 Infection were found in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those who have COVID-19 and those who don't. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to account for frequent confounders and assess the risk of mortality and in-hospital outcomes between the two groups. Result(s): The total of 110,130 DKA admissions were identified between Jan and Dec 2020. COVID-19 Infection was diagnosed in 2,504 patients (2.2%). The average age of the cohort sample was 35 years old, 51% were male, and 60% were white. The average length of stay (LOS) was 3 days, and the average total hospital charges were 33,132 US dollars. The total number of patients who died was 225 patients. When the two groups were compared, COVID-19 Infection was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality among DKA patients (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.7-15.9, p=0.003). COVID-19 patients had a higher risk of acute respiratory failure (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7-3.9, p< 0.001) and septic shock (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.5-9.8, p=0.003). There was no significant difference between the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups in the risk of acute coronary syndrome (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.49-3, p=0.66), cardiac arrest (OR 2, 95% CI 0.5-7.9, p=0.31), hypokalemia (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.92-1.4, p=0.214), deep vein thrombosis (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.14-2.4, p=0.47), or pulmonary embolism (OR 3.6, 95% CI 0.84 - 15.4, p=0.083). COVID-19 patients had a longer mean LOS (4.2 vs 2.9 days, p< 0.001) and higher mean total hospital charges (41,216 vs 32,973 $, p=0.004). Discussion/Conclusion: Patients admitted with DKA and concomitant COVID-19 infection found to have a higher risk of in-hospital mortality and worse hospital outcomes, particularly acute respiratory failure and septic shock. In comparison to non-COVID patients, COVID-19 patients have a longer mean LOS and a higher mean of total hospital charges.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction/Aim: The risk factors for the development of severe COVID-19 illness have been well researched and documented since the beginning of the pandemic. Subsequently, mass vaccination rollouts have occurred with over 90% of the population being fully vaccinated. The aim of this single centre study was to describe the risk factors associated with the development of severe COVID-19 disease in the vaccinated population. Method(s): A retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to the Gold Coast University Hospital during a week (8 th to 14 th inclusive) in January 2022 was conducted. All patients were included regardless of primary indication for admission. Data was obtained using the electronic medical records and included patient demographics, comorbidities, vaccination status (with fully vaccinated defined as two or more doses of any COVID-19 vaccination), COVID-19 severity (as defined by the National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce), complications of disease (such as secondary infection, pulmonary embolism, non-invasive and invasive ventilation, length of stay, ICU admission, mortality, representation/readmission). Univariate analysis was then performed. Result(s): 162 patients were admitted to the Gold Coast University Hospital during the study period and included in the analysis. 103 (63%) patients were fully vaccinated. 52 (32%) patients developed severe COVID-19 disease. In the fully vaccinated group, 34 (33%) patients developed severe COVID-19, compared with 18 (32%) in unvaccinated group). Chronic cardiovascular disease (p=<0.001), respiratory disease (p = 0.025), renal failure (p = 0.044), diabetes (p = 0.003) and current immunocompromise (p = 0.025) were associated with the development of severe COVID-19. Obesity was not a significant risk factor. Conclusion(s): Risk factors for progression to severe COVID 19 previously identified in unvaccinated patients early in the pandemic (with the exception of obesity) remain significantly associated with risk of severe disease in the vaccinated population.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Lung cavitation is a rare radiological finding of COVID- 19 pneumonia associated with unfavorable outcome. Its pathogenesis is unclear and it is characterized by diffuse alveolar damage, intra-alveolar hemorrhage and necrosis of parenchymal cells. Method(s): We retrospectively reviewed the radiological findings of COVID-19 patients admitted to our ICU during the pandemic in order to identify the development of lung cavitary lesions. Result(s): From 11/2020 until 10/2022 1000 patients were admitted to our COVID-19 ICU (92% on invasive mechanical ventilation). According to our data there were three cases of lung cavity formation. The first case was a 78 years male with history of hypertension. Chest CT (Day26) showed a 11.6 cm cavity in the right middle lobe (Fig. 1). The second case was a 52 year old female with history of diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertension and rheumatoid arthritis. Follow up chest CT (D29) revealed progressive development of multiple bilateral cavitary lesions. The third case was a 61 year old male with no medical history, who developed (D17) multiple cavitary lesions in both lower lobes, concomitant with left-sided pulmonary embolism. The presence of other well defined etiologies of cavitary lesions such as mycobacterial and fungal infections as well as neoplasmatic or autoimmune diseases had been widely excluded. However, since pulmonary cavitation is a late complication of severe COVID disease, we cannot overlook the fact that all patients suffered from superinfections by XDR Acinetobacter baumanii and/or Klebsiella pneumonia, as most of our patients with prolonged length of stay. Moreover, two of the three patients developed pneumothorax. All patients finally died. Conclusion(s): Although bacterial co-infection does not allow absolute association between cavitary formation and coronavirus disease, it seems that destructive triggers, such as bacteria or mechanical ventilation, may aggravate COVID underlying lung lesions leading to cavitation.
ABSTRACT
Case Report: Cryptococcosis is an opportunistic infection caused by the encapsulated yeast Cryptococcus, with C. neoformans and C. gattii being the most common species to cause human disease. Immunocompromised individuals are predisposed to infections with C. neoformans, which has known predilection to CNS and pulmonary lymph nodes. We present a unique case of disseminated cryptococcosis in the setting of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), cirrhosis, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor use and steroid use for COVID19. Method(s): A single-patient case report was conducted after IRB approval. Case Presentation: A 55-year-old woman with uncontrolled diabetes, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis on adalimumab, hepatitis C status post boceprevir, cirrhosis, former IV drug use, and ESRD on hemodialysis via bovine arterial-venous fistula graft presented with worsening dyspnea, cough, and altered mental status. Three months prior, patient was admitted to an outside hospital for COVID19, complicated by pulmonary embolism status post anticoagulation therapy. Patient was treated with an unknown steroid regimen, which was continued by a second outside facility when symptoms failed to improve. Patient then presented to our facility 24 hours after discharge due to continued symptoms. On admission, patient was noted to have altered mentation and hypoxia with pulmonary edema on chest x-ray and was urgently hemodialyzed. Further work-up was obtained due to non-resolving symptoms, including blood and sputum cultures, cocci serology and QuantiFERON gold. CT chest revealed bilateral consolidations. Patient was started on antibiotics for presumed hospital-acquired pneumonia. During the hospital stay, preliminarily blood cultures grew yeast and patient was started on Micafungin. However, Micafungin was changed to Liposomal Amphotericin B as ovoid structures seen on gram stain could not confirm nor rule out cryptococcus. Subsequent bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage cultures, as well as final blood cultures resulted Cryptococcus neoformans. Serum cryptococcus antigen returned reactive, titer 1:512. Antibiotics were discontinued and Isavuconazonium was started with Liposomal Amphotericin B. Due to recurrent headaches, lumbar puncture was obtained and revealed lymphocytic pleocytosis without cryptococcal antigenicity. Patient completed 14 days of Liposomal Amphotericin B and Isavuconazole with continuation of Isavuconazole upon discharge. Conclusion(s): Disseminated cryptococcosis in non-HIV patients is rare in the modern HIV era. Clinicians should be aware and include it in their differential of any patient with multiple risk factors for opportunistic infection. In patients with cirrhosis and ESRD, treatment is limited given altered pharmacokinetics. Studies have shown improved survival with the addition of Isavuconazole in patients with disseminated cryptococcosis with CNS involvement in the setting of chronic liver disease and ESRD.
ABSTRACT
Background: As a quality service improvement response since elexacaftor/ tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) became available and the yearly average number of cystic fibrosis (CF) pregnancies (n = 7 pre-2020, n = 33 in 2021) increased significantly at an adult CF center (~600 people with CF), a monthly multidisciplinary CF-maternal health virtual clinic was established with antenatal virtual CF exercise classes dedicated to providing adaptive, specialist support to this cohort, aswell as outreach guidance and education to local obstetric teams. Method(s): This was a single-center retrospective reviewof Royal Brompton Hospital CF-Maternal Health multidisciplinary team clinic records and a patient survey from March 2020 to March 2022. Result(s): Of 47 pregnancies in 41 women (median age 30;) eligible for ELX/ TEZ/IVA at start of pregnancy, 40% (n = 19) were unplanned, and 19% (n = 9) used assisted conception. Three women with a history of infertility conceived naturally, having required assisted conception for previous pregnancies, and five women had multiple pregnancies during the study period. ELX/TEZ/IVA was continued in 60% (n = 28), delayed in 28% (n = 13), and stopped in 13% (n = 6) of pregnancies through maternal choice and careful clinical counselling. Pre-pregnancy pulmonary status was poorer in women who continued than in those who delayed or stopped (Table 1). Of those who stopped, 85% (n = 5) restarted because of pulmonary deterioration by the third trimester. Prenatal CF complications included at least one episode of minor hemoptysis in 21% (n = 9/41) of women, at least one infective exacerbation in 55% of pregnancies (n = 26/47), and noninvasive ventilation in one woman. Other pregnancy-associated complications included one case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, one case of sub-segmental pulmonary embolism, and two cases of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Excluding 10 first trimester terminations, 10 current pregnancies, and one patient relocation, obstetric outcomes available for 26 pregnancies confirmed a live birth rate of 85% (n = 22/26) and a 15% first-trimester miscarriage rate (n = 4). Obstetric complications included preterm delivery rate of 23% (n = 6/26), including two cases of COVID infection resulting in two neonatal intensive care unit admissions, one case of endometritis after cesarean section, and a fourthdegree perineal tear. There were no ectopic pregnancies, maternal or neonatal deaths, or reports of infant cataracts or congenital malformations. Median gestational age was 37/40 weeks (range 29-40). Mode of delivery was via cesarean section in 45% (n = 10/22, of which twowere emergency) and vaginal in 55% (n = 12/22), of which 83% (n = 10/12) were via induction of labor for diabetes (CF or gestational) indication. Deliveries were supported and occurred equally at local obstetric units and in tertiarycare obstetric hospital settings (50%, n = 11/22). Patient-experience survey responses cited high levels of confidence in health optimization and prioritization during pregnancy and praised excellent inter-health care provider communication and peer-to-peer emotional support provided among expectant mothers in the virtual prenatal exercise groups. Table 1. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftoreligible expectant mothers according to therapeutic decision (Table Presented) Conclusion(s): In the absence of clinical trial safety data, the novel approach of a dedicated CF-maternal health multidisciplinary team clinic with local obstetric outreach support has ensured regular specialist clinical and emotional peer-to-peer support for this cohort of women eligible for ELX/ TEZ/IVA to ensure optimal outcomes and experiences of their pregnancies, where appropriate, close to home.Copyright © 2022, European Cystic Fibrosis Society. All rights reserved